Azim Premji University (APU) has filed a First Information Report (FIR) against organizers of a campus event, prompting criticism from the university’s Student Council. The FIR, lodged with Bengaluru Rural Police, was initiated based on a complaint from the university registrar.
University Accuses Event Organizers
The registrar’s complaint alleges the student group, SPARK Reading Circle, used the university’s name without authorization. It also claims the event’s content caused a “security breach” on campus. The university has not specified the exact nature of the alleged security breach.
Student Council Calls FIR ‘Disproportionate’
The APU Student Council formally criticized the FIR. In a statement released on February 26 , they labeled the university’s move “disproportionate.” The council urged the administration to withdraw the criminal proceedings.
“We acknowledge that organising a campus event without prior administrative approval may constitute a breach of university protocol,” the statement read. “However, the student council believes that such a breach is best addressed through the university’s own internal mechanisms such as the disciplinary committee, rather than through an FIR.”
Event Linked to Kashmir Discussion
The controversy arose from an event organized by SPARK. The event marked 35 years since the alleged Kunan-Poshpora mass sexual violence case in Kashmir. Members of the Akhil Bharatiya Vidyarthi Parishad (ABVP) reportedly entered the campus during this discussion.
Dispute Over Confrontation Aftermath
The Student Council highlighted perceived unequal treatment following the confrontation. They noted that individuals who allegedly entered the campus uninvited, caused harm, and damaged property received bail on bailable charges. Conversely, students who organized a “peaceful gathering” now face a non-bailable offense.
“The asymmetry in outcomes” deeply concerned the council. They stated that campus discussions should be protected academic spaces.
Concerns Over Academic Freedom
The APU Student Council framed the issue as a matter of academic freedom. They argued that the university’s curriculum encourages critical engagement with history and social justice. The council believes a criminal FIR undermines the institution’s foundation of intellectual freedom.
The council stated its commitment to finding a solution protecting student well-being. They formally requested the administration reconsider the criminal action.
SPARK Claims Vandalism and Assault
SPARK, described as a student-youth led magazine focusing on socio-political issues, detailed their experience on Instagram. They alleged ABVP members forcibly entered the campus and vandalized property. “Ban Spark” was reportedly written on an entrance wall.
SPARK also claimed students faced verbal abuse and physical targeting. They stated ABVP members labeled students as “anti-nationals.” The group specifically mentioned targeting of students wearing skull caps.
Police Response Questioned
SPARK questioned the police’s initial response. They alleged police acted as “passive spectators” during the incident. No immediate attempt was made to prevent the group from entering, according to SPARK.
ABVP Cites ‘Anti-National Event’
Abhinandan Mirji, Bengaluru City Secretary for ABVP, defended their actions. He stated the organization objected to the event’s framing. Mirji claimed information indicated SPARK was conducting an “anti-national event.” He cited the event’s focus on the Kunan-Poshpora incident.
Mirji alleged event posters contained “separatist elements.” He claimed SPARK, backed by the All India Students’ Association (AISA), has organized similar events promoting “pro-Naxal and pro-separatism” viewpoints.
He stated ABVP members attempted to meet the vice-chancellor to cancel the event. They were prevented by security. Mirji also claimed Spark members raised “pro-Palestine slogans.” He added that police arrested ABVP members but took no action against the event organizers.